Dr. John Campbell, is a nurse and nurse teacher with a PhD. That makes him quite entitled to utilise Dr. every bit a prefix to his name. Clearly he is an intelligent man and obviously convincing since he has a broad post-obit of disciples. There are some 823k subscribers to his videos.

His credentials are not the purpose of this post and they are not in question. What is questionable is what he says with authority. Having watched more than than one of his videos his advice is totally and admittedly in line with regime measures and restrictions. measures imposed on u.s.a. without scientific or medical corroboration, yet he advocates them without question. If yous have never come across him spotter this contempo video. His personal rationale tin can be gleaned from the notice on the wall behind him, which advises social-distancing, wearing of masks and washing of easily.

Of course you should wash your easily after going to the lavatory. That is an understandable and long-established protocol of hygiene. Simply contempo directives are leading to obsessive compulsive disorders generated over a virus which – and people really must start to understand this – reached its peak nine months ago.

With the constant paw-washing blasted at usa from all media, supported by the likes of Dr. Campbell, the bulk of the populace is going to end up like Howard Hughes – without his money. Hughes was forever washing his hands. Unfortunately his staff had to adhere to his rituals too. Hughes "was and so wealthy he could consul compulsive behaviour to his employees and so was never being challenged."

Is it from fear that so few are challenging these extreme and psychologically unbalanced measures Dr. Campbell, and those who have taken away parliamentary democracy, endorse?

Compulsive washing of hands is the to the lowest degree unsafe of Dr. Campbell's messages to his followers. He is a promoter of untested vaccines. with a detail penchant for the Oxford AstraZeneca production. This enthusiasm is on the basis of one peer-reviewed paper.

Don't become me wrong, his explanation of the paper is expert, and shows an achieved talent for didactics. Having a talent for teaching is i thing. It is another thing when that which is being taught is flawed. What Campbell teaches is flawed.

Later on boasting that the paper linked higher up is the "first peer-reviewed paper that we have always had on the AstraZeneca vaccine" he adds information technology is "the get-go on any vaccine" against severe astute respiratory syndrome coronavirus 2 (SARS-CoV-2). The peer-reviewed paper espoused in his video was published in the Lancet, 8 December 2020. Instead of rushing to be starting time at getting a product to market a little caution might accept been more prudent and advisable.

Dr. Campbell's enthusiasm for getting the Oxford AstraZenca vaccine inflicted upon the earth is unbridled. He tells his audience it is across his comprehension why Europe is "lagging behind" and he uses other colourful endorsements such as "baroque filibuster" and "beggars credulity" to drive his bulletin home. Information technology is the errors of omission, details Campbell leaves out, that cause greatest concern.

The peer-reviewed paper shows very few tests took place on older people.

Nosotros have reported immunogenicity information showing similar immune responses following vaccination with two doses of ChAdOx1 nCov-19 in older adults, including those older than 70 years of historic period, when compared with those younger than 55 years.half-dozen As older historic period groups were recruited later than younger age groups, at that place has been less time for cases to accrue and every bit a upshot, efficacy data in these cohorts are currently express by the small number of cases, but additional data volition exist available in future analyses.

It is cynical to recollect that the "additional data" may well be coming from poor people in care homes and elsewhere in older historic period brackets. These victims, who may accept memory and other age-related problems, take not been told they are guinea pigs. The residue of u.s.a. have not been told our elderly relatives are beingness experimented on with a vaccine rushed out and funded past those in whose interests the experiments are beingness performed. That is some other thing Campbell left out.

He holds the "paper" up in triumph, every bit though he has only been awarded an MBE, but he is very careful that all its contents are not bachelor for public scrutiny. Had he let the camera scroll a little further down the paper viewers would take learned that amongst its funding bodies are: Bill & Melinda Gates Foundation, NIHR, Oxford Biomedical Research Centre and AstraZeneca. No conflict of interest there and then!

Dr John is an endearing, avuncular kind of character who tells viewers he has "been giving intravenous vaccines for decades". His sincerity in this respect is non in question. It is what he teaches that is questionable. He prioritises getting the United kingdom vaccine out within the next week or two based on this one self-funded study. This is reckless, and more reckless, he may get out those watching the video, who but hear what they want to hear, with a belief that the vaccine is 100% safe (22 minutes). In fairness, he does say elsewhere that no vaccine is totally safe.

That is the message we all should be taking on board.

What Dr Campbell left out

As well as non revealing the peer-reviewed newspaper'south funding sources, or the fact that a negligible amount of testing had been washed on the elderly, the main question yet goes unanswered. What are they vaccinating against? This graph, from the Part of National Statistics, shows there was no major pandemic and the virus has only followed a familiar path most all viruses accept.

The horizontal line does not cover the menstruation 1901-2020. as it might appear, only only from January to August 2020. It has been drawn across to compare previous years of flu and pneumonia deaths against 2020 for influenza, pneumonia and COVID-19. The graph, and what a bright 1,000 discussion picture it is, has a misleading heading. Although information technology states that at that place have been more deaths from COVID-19 than in any yr since 2000 it fails to mention that flu and pneumonia deaths accept plummeted, indicating that some may well have been added to the COVID-19 death toll. The huge spire at 1919-xx shows what a real pandemic looks like. 2020 has only been aberrant because the likes of Matt Hancock, Boris Johnson and Dr. Campbell have made it abnormal.

This and so-chosen pandemic is the UK government's reefer from which simply those who removed parliamentary constabulary and normal debate through the Coronavirus Deed 2020 are getting any kicking. It has an atrocious niff about information technology. It reeks of "main race" mentality the "last solution" of which would eventually encounter the eradication of all people thought to be of no more than value than factors of production.

Tests on vaccines for SARS-COV-2 accept been fast-tracked in an experiment like none before. There are countless stories of vaccines and medication existence tested, ofttimes on the military, or in underdeveloped countries, where adverse reactions just get known years into the hereafter. Anthrax is a case in signal where British soldiers were vaccinated in the second Gulf War fifty-fifty though Gulf War syndrome was shown to be an illness caused past Anthrax vaccination in the starting time Gulf State of war. Another case in point is Thalidomide.

Thalidomide was originally developed and tested in the concentration camps of German occupation. It was later marketed by Chemie Grünenthal. The chairman of the Grünenthal's advisory committee at this time was Otto Ambros, an inventor of the nervus-gas sarin, and a man guilty of Nazi state of war-crimes. Thalidomide, as well as leading to decease in some cases acquired 10.000 deformities in children whose mothers took the drug during pregnancy in the tardily fifties early on sixties.

Its maker, Chemie Grünenthal, a modest German language company relatively new to pharmacology, marketed it aggressively in 46 countries with the guarantee that information technology could be "given with complete safety to pregnant women and nursing mothers without whatever adverse effect on mother and child."

Does that not sound like the kind of preaching Dr. Campbell might administrate to his sheep?

Population control through sterilisation may likewise exist a policy of today'south super-race, a social club to which eugenicists similar Claus Shwab and Bill Gates well-and-truly belong. Sterilisation has happened so often from vaccination programmes it is no longer questionable. The Nazis practised it on Jews, communists and gypsies. The Israelis themselves practised it on Ethiopian Jews. Neb Gates' team practised it on African and Indian girls and women of child-bearing historic period. For years these experiments have been leading up to the proposed mass vaccination initiative now beingness foisted on the world to rid it of a virus which no longer has any potency among the healthy, something Dr Campbell avoided mentioning.

He did not mention what ingredients the Oxford AstraZenica vaccine independent. Vaccines can be used to deliver other agents. A whistleblower from Glaxo Smith Kline spilled the beans over the ingredients of their candidate. It contains an anti HCG antigen to sterilize women while for men there is a GNRH (Gonadotropin-releasing hormone) antagonist to shrink testicles. This antagonist also chemically attacks the sperm and the dead sperm makes women who receive information technology infertile.

Neither did Dr Campbell mention that the virus, SARS-COV-2, is man-made. This has been proven and may well be the reason why its full identity, in purified atmospheric condition, has never been revealed. All the nonsense from those backside this scam who tried to become u.s. brainwashed into believing it came from bats, pandas, monkeys or whatever mammalian source they could conjure upward, take been outed.

Sadly, it is worse even than what has been documented above. In September 2019, before COVID-19 became an everyday term, a supporter of the engineering, Chris Burt, described the ID2020 Brotherhood's launch of a new product from Gavi, NEC, and Simprints. He explains how this ingenious technology traces individuals who take been vaccinated – by means of a digital ID. In March this yr Burt modified his commodity to dispel fears from those sceptical among united states of america.

This mail service was updated at 4:58pm on March 26, 2020 to clarify that the program is intended to allow people to receive vaccination and prove they take received it, not to rail individuals, as claimed past some conspiracy theorists.

People are quite capable of telling authorities whether they have had a vaccination or not, should they choose, and conspiracy theorists are quite within their rights to question this technology'south utilise in monitoring people anywhere and everywhere. That includes Bangladesh, and Austin, where the globalists were working together with "homeless people and the service providers who engage with them to develop a blockchain-enabled digital identity platform called MyPass to empower homeless people with their own identity data."

Whatever could be incorrect with that, Dr. Campbell?